論刑事訴訟中的證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任

論刑事訴訟中的證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任

摘    要

    證明責(zé)任是刑事訴訟證明理論的核心部分，但長(zhǎng)期以來，學(xué)界往往將證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任混為1談。通過對(duì)證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任這兩個(gè)概念進(jìn)行辨析，分析證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任各自的分配原則及責(zé)任承擔(dān)主體，有利于完善和豐富刑事訴訟證明理論。

關(guān)鍵詞： 刑事訴訟； 證明責(zé)任； 舉證責(zé)任； 相互關(guān)系； 責(zé)任主體

ABSTRACT
  
Proved the responsibility is the core that proved the theory of the criminal prosecution. But since long ago, academic circles think proves the responsibility and presents evidence the responsibility are the same concept. Compared with proved the responsibility and presents evidence the responsibility these two concepts, the analysis proved the responsibility and presents evidence the responsibility respective assignment principle and the responsibility undertakes the main body. This is advantageous to being perfect and the rich criminal prosecution proves the theory.

Key words:  Criminal prosecution; Proves the responsibility; Presents evidence the responsibility; Reciprocity; Responsibility main body

..............................
注：【包括：畢業(yè)論文，任務(wù)書，開題報(bào)告】

【論刑事訴訟中的證明責(zé)任和舉證責(zé)任】相關(guān)文章：

論刑事訴訟中的免證事實(shí)03-28

關(guān)于中國(guó)行政訴訟中的舉證責(zé)任11-27

試論民事訴訟中舉證責(zé)任的承擔(dān)12-22

辯護(hù)律師在刑事訴訟中的地位及責(zé)任12-08

論刑事訴訟中控審分離原則的理論與實(shí)踐03-25

論刑事訴訟中公、檢、法三機(jī)關(guān)的關(guān)系03-06

我國(guó)刑事訴訟舉證責(zé)任與證實(shí)責(zé)任分配制度研究12-08

刑事訴訟中的效率價(jià)值03-19

論刑事辨認(rèn)11-13